Baru Nikah Sepekan, Aisha Minta Cerai Karena ‘Burung’ Suami Kebesaran Berikut Kronologinya


SETIAP pasangan yang baru menikah tentu berharap bisa langgeng dalam kebersamaan. Namun, tidak demikian dengan Aisha Dannupawa yang menikah dengan Ali Maizinari. Pasalnya, meski baru seminggu menikah tapi Aisha langsung menggugat cerai.
Hasil gambar untuk Baru Nikah Sepekan, Aisha Minta Cerai Karena ‘Burung’ Suami Kebesaran
Aisha memang menyandang status janda sebelum dinikahi Ali. Perempuan asal Zamfara, Nigeria itu juga sudah memiliki tiga orang anak.

Lantas mengapa Aisha yang baru sepekan mengakhiri status janda ingin kembali menjanda? Usut punya usut, ternyata Aisha merasa tak kuat dengan ukuran penis suaminya yang tak ketulungan.

 Tak disebutkan secara rinci ukuran penis Ali saat masih "mentah" maupun ketika sudah tegang. Yang pasti, Aisha mengaku ketakutan setelah kena 'serangan' dari suami barunya itu.

Karenanya, Aisha langsung mendatangi pengadilan agama agar membatalkan pernikahannya. Di depan pengadilan, ibu rumah tangga itu menceritakan pernikahannya dengan Ali setelah kegagalannya pada pernikahan pertama.

“Saat dia (Ali, red) datang, kami memang berhubungan badan. Tapi pengalaman yang ada merupakan sebuah mimpi buruk,” katanya seperti dikutip Daily Mirror dari koran lokal Nigeria. “Alih-alih menikmati berhubungan seksual, ini ternyata menjadi sesuatu yang lain karena penisnya terlalu besar."

 Aisha bahkan mengaku langsung minum obat penghilang rasa sakit setelah pertama kali berhubungan badan dengan Ali. Karenanya saat untuk kedua kalinya Ali mengajak bercinta lagi, Aisha jadi trauma. “Tak kuat untuk menanggungnya,” katanya.

Ali pun tak menyangkal tudingan Aisha. Di pengadilan, Ali mengakui bahwa dia memang memiliki penis yang berukuran cukup besar.

Namun, Ali pasang syarat untuk meladeni gugatan cerai Aisha. Ali mengaku mau diceraikan asalkan mas kawinnya dikembalikan.

Yaelah.... mau enaknya sendiri.(ara/jpnn)
The IRS considers group-term life insurance provided by your employer to be a tax-free benefit so long as the policy's death benefit is less than $50,000. Therefore, there are no tax consequences if your group-term policy does not exceed $50,000 in coverage. However, there are tax implications if an employee is provided over $50,000 in life insurance coverage and pays less in premiums than the IRS has deemed the policy to be worth. In this situation, the value of the life insurance policy in excess of what an employee pays in premiums is referred to as imputed income — which is subject to income taxes. For example, say you have a group life insurance policy that has $100,000 in coverage, and your employer pays the premiums for the insurance. Since the death benefit of the plan exceeds $50,000, the life insurance would be subject to imputed income. This is calculated by your employer using an IRS imputed income table and then reported on your W-2 tax form.An employee has a basic life insurance policy with his company that has a death benefit of $150,000, which is paid entirely by his employer. The employee is currently 47 years old. Using the IRS table, this employee would fall into the 45 to 49-year-old range and incur a cost of 15 cents per $1,000 in coverage. Excess coverage = $150,000 - $50,000 = $100,000 Monthly imputed income = ($100,000 / $1,000) x .15 = $15 Yearly imputed income = $15 x 12 = $180 The employer would then include $180 in the employee’s W-2 form at the end of the year.An employee pays $150 per year for a voluntary life insurance policy with his company that has a death benefit of $250,000. The employee is currently 47 years old. Using the IRS table, this employee would fall into the 45-to 49-year-old range and incur a cost of 15 cents per $1,000 in coverage. Excess coverage = $250,000 - $50,000 = $200,000 Monthly imputed income = ($200,000 / $1,000) x .15 = $30 Yearly imputed income = $30 x 12 = $360 - $150 (what the employee pays in premiums) = $210